A correctly specified floor can perform like a non-compliant floor in service if the cleaning regime is wrong for the surface. Polishing-style products on textured tile, residue-leaving degreasers, or under-rinsing of caustic cleaners all reduce in-service PTV. Pendulum testing across the cleaning cycle is the only way to identify whether the regime is supporting or undermining slip resistance.
Several cleaning-related effects reduce PTV over time:
One of the most reliable findings in service-environment pendulum testing is a floor that meets specification immediately after a deep clean but fails several days into the cleaning cycle as polishing-style products accumulate. The post-clean PTV is not the PTV that customers and staff actually walk on. Testing toward the end of the cleaning cycle, not immediately after, captures in-service performance.
For risk-management and claim-defence purposes, the cleaning regime should be documented alongside the pendulum data:
This converts the pendulum data from a static number into a contextualised performance measurement.
Where the cleaning is outsourced to a third party, the contract may not specify a slip-performance requirement — only a cleanliness requirement. Pendulum data identifies where the contracted regime is producing a side-effect on slip performance, and supports either a contract variation or a cleaning-product change.
Tell us about the situation and we'll come back with a quote within one working day.
Request a Quote