How a surface is prepared before pendulum testing affects the result. For routine in-service testing, the preparation is minimal — the floor is tested in the condition it is found, with light cleaning of loose contamination. For laboratory and forensic work, the preparation is more involved and is part of what the report must document.
For routine periodic and post-incident testing, the principle is to test the surface in the condition the public actually walks on. Heavy preparation that produces a 'clean' result not representative of the surface in normal use is misleading.
Standard practice is to:
The rubber slider edge is conditioned to standard roughness before each set of recorded swings. This is part of the test method, not part of surface preparation, but it interacts:
Documenting the conditioning protocol is part of the UKAS-accredited record.
For laboratory or factory testing on flooring samples (research, manufacturer datasheet generation, dispute investigation of retained samples), preparation is more controlled:
The point is reproducibility — different laboratories testing the same product should produce the same result.
For forensic work — testing a retained sample or section of original flooring as part of slip-claim investigation — preparation is documented in detail because it directly affects the evidential value:
The aim is to produce test data that can be confidently traced back to the incident-time surface — or, where the chain has been broken, to identify exactly where and how.
Tell us about the site and we'll come back with a quote within one working day.
Request a Quote